|
KMID : 0363420200340010026
|
|
Journal of Korean Oriental Pediatrics
2020 Volume.34 No. 1 p.26 ~ p.36
|
|
|
Evaluation of the Reporting and Methodological Quality of the Systematic Review from the Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine
|
|
Shim Soo-Bo
Lee Ju-Ah
Lee Hye-Lim
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the reporting quality and methodological quality of systematic reviews from the Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine.
Methods: Systematic reviews were selected from the Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine (JPKM) by utilizing Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS) and JPKM homepage. Two independent researchers assessed the reporting quality through Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline checklist, and assessed the methodological quality of systematic review through Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool checklist.
Results: Four systematic reviews were finally selected for the assessment. When assessed by PRISMA, three literatures were little insufficient, and one literature was sufficient. When assessed by AMSTAR 2, three literatures were moderate quality, and one literature was critically low quality. Also, all of the reviews had no information about ‘Protocol and registration’, ‘publication bias’, and ‘conflicts of interest’.
Conclusions: Systematic review is important for Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine and Korean Medicine Society. Efforts are needed to improve the reporting and methodological quality of the systematic reviews through PRISMA and AMSTAR 2.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Systematic reviews, Pediatrics of Korean Medicine, Methodological quality, Reporting quality, PRISMA, AMSTAR 2
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
 
|